Refinancing With a 1031 Tax Exchange
One of the key concepts in the 1031 exchange process is that an investor must not draw any cash benefit from the funds resulting from the sale of his or her relinquished property; any kind of monetary benefit from the sale is considered to be boot, and this means, in fact, liable for capital gains taxes. In keeping with this logic, refinancing for the purpose of removing stored value from the 1031 replacement property delves into a rather gray area with regard to acceptability under Section 1031.
In a case involving an investor named Garcia, the court clearly asserted that any benefit gained by an investor resultant from the refinancing of a property in anticipation of selling it in a 1031 tax exchange will be considered to be boot. This court decision set a precedent for dealing with these kinds of situations . Currently, a more popular tactic is waiting until the replacement property has been closed on, and to refinance the piece of property at some point later. This tactic, however, raises some questions about how long it is appropriate to wait before performing this refinancing and removing equity from a property.
The old guard among real estate investors will advise you that you should wait a considerable period of time post-closing (perhaps two years), to make absolutely sure that you’re complying with the intent of 1031 tax exchanges. The popular mindset amongst more liberal minded contingency of real estate investors, however, is to assume that the closing on a replacement property marks the definitive ending point of to the exchange process, and that one need not fret over the substantiation of the exchange from there onward. For a property investor who looks at the exchange process from this perspective, it is not relevant how long one waits before refinancing one’s 1031 replacement property, and many do indeed elect to do this immediately after the closing has occurred.
If you are looking for any kind of hard and fast maxim as to when it is safe to refinance a 1031 replacement property, then you are destined to be disappointed, at least within the confines of this short article. The two schools of thought described in this article are just the opinions of a few, and they are examples of only a few of the viewpoints an investor may adopt. Property investors vary greatly when it comes to the way in which they elect to look at these sorts of gray areas, and the wisest suggestion I can {give you is simply to enlist the help of a qualified tax adviser or other legal expert in making your ultimate decision, and to work together with him or her so that you can decide on the approach that will work best in the context of your particular situation.